Click here to subscribe to Under The Radar Media at WordPress

Showing posts with label Left Right Paradigm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Left Right Paradigm. Show all posts

The Mainstream Media vs The American People

Friday, November 16, 2007 by Maasanova

Note: If you are reading this post through Facebook, please click on the 'view original post link'

"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way, and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theatre." - Frank Zappa


Behind the scenes of the upcoming 2008 election, there is small war brewing and the battle lines have now been established. The two sides consist of the people who have had enough of this phony, pro-war left/right paradigm on one side, and the phony left/right media itself on the other.

The war is analogous to the battle of David and Goliath, where a small, but efficient and dangerous soldier verses an tired, old but powerful giant. YouTube, the internet, and your average American citizen is that tiny soldier and FOX, CNN, defense contractors and the entire pro-war establishment represents Goliath. The feud was established for one reason:
Texas Republican Presidential Candidate Ron Paul.

The mainstream media has done everything it can to censor and exclude Ron Paul from the 2008 Presidential election process largely because of his anti-war, anti-Federal Reserve and pro-Constitutionalist views.
Paul's unique stance on these issues, which are the backbone of his campaign, have ignited people from all across the board, from conservatives who have lost faith in the Republican Party, to liberals who disapprove of the Democratically elected Congress and everyone in between.



While his October 30, 2007 appearance on Jay Leno helped to spark national interest and exposure, the Ron Paul mania officially kicked off on November 5, 2007 when an organizer, completely independent of the Paul campaign, raised over 4.2 million dollars in one day, breaking all GOP records for a single day's fund raising ever. The fund raiser was based on the movie "V For Vendetta" and a historical anarchist named Guy Fawkes, who on November 5, 1605, attempted to set bomb the British House of Parliament and overthrow the government.

The media outlets had to acknowledge this accomplishment, but they did so begrudgingly. This put network news outlets in a tough spot, because now they had been officially exposed deliberately excluding Ron Paul from proper and accurate news coverage. Previously there had been many attempts by
online journalists to smear Paul with outrageous accusations of his campaign using spambots, hacking online polls and spewing false claims of racism. As they were unable to gain any traction with their skeptical readers, their frustration and desperation became increasingly desperate. The following video is an example of why the mainstream media outlets are no longer relevant and why their credibility and ratings are in the toilet.



As you can see, the mainstream media outlets use trickery, deception and outright fraud to manipulate popular opinion. It doesn't matter if you are a liberal or a conservative; the media is there only to give you what appears to be two choices, and silence any opposition which threatens their status quo. This should be blatantly apparent, especially when take into account that President Bush has a 29% approval rating, Vice President Dick Cheney with a 9% approval rating and the Democratic controlled Congress at 12%.



The bottom line here is of course money and war. If you look on the left side of the political spectrum, Hillary Clinton is now being backed by the same same organizations who funded Bush for the past two elections. These organizations consist of Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing, have a stake in the continuation of the Iraq war and starting the Iran war conflict. Clinton herself said that if she is elected that she would not even consider troop withdraw until after her first term 2013. It should also be noted that true anti-war Democrat candidates like Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinch get little if any
coverage at all.



The conservative right is even wackier. Rudy Giuliani is the so called front runner of the Republican party, is pro-war. Guliani's support comes from the typical so-called Christian conservative, anti-abortion right (even though Giuliani is pro-abortion and pro-gay marriage). All of the other Republican candidates take a strong pro-war stance and want to use airs trikes on another innocent country. as well. It is no surprise that the Republicans, who have long since been based on family values, have nothing else to run their campaigns on besides war and terror due to the many GOP sex scandals and the corruption over the course of Bush's tenure as president.

So to recap, we either have war with Clinton or war with Giuliani. Take your pick America. Both candidates, already wrought with scandals, are for all practical purposes, completely unelectable. The mainstream media is in a very, very tough spot now. They know the public is not buying into the campaigns of either Rudy Giuliani or Hillary Clinton so they have no choice but to roll out the big guns of propaganda against any real competition. In a shocking display that reeked of desperation, Glen Beck took an opportunity to label Ron Paul supporters as potential terrorists and a domestic threat to the US!



This bold attack on Ron Paul is particularly disgusting and irresponsible considering the scope and size of their viewer ship. It is also very insulting to his audience to see a national syndicated TV and radio talk show host stoop to this level of defamation against a group of people who have not committed any offenses at all.
Stephen Dupont , a former decorated Marine, was prompted to send Glenn Beck and CNN an e-mail in response to the nature of the broadcast. In it, Dupont compared his time spent in the service to Beck's time being an alcoholic struggling with drug addiction. Dupont also informed the networks that he would no longer be supporting the network's sponsors and made a call for others to do the same.

My plea to you is to take a serious look into the donating to the Ron Paul campaign, and if you can't support him, at least consider voting for him when the time comes. Another independent internet campaign fund raiser is scheduled for December 16, 2007 with a goal to double the amount of donations received on November 5. This date commemorates the infamous Boston Tea Party, when American colonists protested oppressive taxes by dumping tea into the harbor. We Americans have truly come full circle with our oppressors and while Ron Paul alone may not be able to end it, there are many people who believe he is the only chance we've got to reclaim an America which is based on the Constitution.






It's Time To Move Past the False Left-Right Paradigm

Sunday, September 30, 2007 by Maasanova

by Maasonva

Note: If you are reading this post through Facebook, please click on the 'view original post' link


The two party American political system, or the false left-right paradigm, is a fraudulent system meant to give the illusion that at the higher levels of government, Americans have a choice when they go to the voting booths on election day. It is meant to keep citizens divided into two easily controlled groups so that they will never be able to be come together and stand up to their ruling class.


The one thing I can't seem to understand is that while most people are willing to accept that the US political system is corrupt, the corruption always comes from opposing side. To most so-called liberals, all of the problems in America can be traced directly back to George W. Bush and his bungling, incompetent administration. And to most so-called conservatives, President Bill Clinton is the one to blame for all the problems due to his failure to capture Osama Bin Laden prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001, his scandalous sexual indiscretions, and a long trail of dead people under his administration.


I recently came across the shocking fact that forty percent of Americans have never lived when there wasn't a Bush or a Clinton in the White House. And now, if Hillary Clinton were to be elected and re-elected, the nation could go 28 years in a row with the same two families governing the country. So, are the two political camps really opposed to each other, or is there a little game of "pass the baton" going on at the behest of a naive and subservient public that is willing to play along? My guess is the latter.


Case 1: On Bill Clinton's last day in office, he pardoned an a bona fide hard-core criminal named Marc Rich. To some people that have followed the Clinton administration, the name Marc Rich will ring a bell. Marc Rich is an agent of the Mossad (the Israeli counterpart to the CIA) who has too many crimes to list. March Rich was charged on September 19, 1983, by a U.S. Federal Grand Jury on more than fifty counts of wire fraud, racketeering, trading with the enemy and evading more than $48 million in income taxes, however the mainstream me only reported his tax evasion. You can read more about the crimes of Marc Rich in detail by visiting the very excellent blog/forum Anti-Neocons.

Case 2: Now lets fast forward to the current administration of President George W. Bush. I'm sure everyone is familiar with I. "Scooter" Lewis Libbey, whose recent prison sentence was commuted by Bush. So what does Scooter Libbey have to do with all this? Libbey just happened to be one of Marc Rich's lawyers for his numerous trials. Libby arranged for Rich's eleventh hour pardon by outgoing President Bill Clinton in January 2001. The pardon of Rich was urged in a phone call to Clinton by then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, as well as Shimon Peres and Ehud Olmert.


Case 3: Say what you want about September 11, but in my opinion, Hurricane Katrina is America's 21st century crisis. We all know how well Americans can come together after tragedies, but I don't think anyone expected to see George HW. Bush and Bill Clinton to come together and get an act together and go on the road to raise funds for poor, displaced victims of the hurricane.

On September 5, 2005, Clinton and Bush
announced their unlikely partnership to aid in the Hurricane Katrina efforts. While I am told to always be careful to which organizations to give to, I definitely didn't need to do any extensive research on this organization to find out that this whole operation was just another Bush/Clinton corporate payoff on the backs of American taxayers. In fact I was told all I needed to know right from the website's home page:

The Fund will not provide direct assistance to individuals or programs. Rather, it will work primarily through partnerships and collaborations with other organizations in the following categories:

• Intermediary grant makers: Organizations with experience in grant making at the county/parish, state, and regional levels

• Direct service entities: Institutions that operate directly (rather than as intermediary grant makers) at the community, county/parish, state, or regional level (including national nonprofit agencies operating at those levels)



Case 4: Fast forward to to the 2006 elections when the Democrats won on a clear mandate to end the Iraq war and impeach President Bush. Nancy Pelosi says this:

“I have said it before and I will say it again: Impeachment is off the table,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said during a news conference. Pelosi also said Democrats, despite complaining about years of unfair treatment by the majority GOP, “are not about getting even” with Republicans She said the GOP, which frequently excluded Democrats from conference committee hearings and often blocked attempts to introduce amendments, would not suffer similar treatment.



Now that's called "teamwork!"



Case 5: Finally we come full circle with the Bush/Clinton power sharing monarchy. Reports have now come out that not only Bush has been secretly advising Hillary Clinton on maintaining the occupation of Iraq, but that other top conservatives like Newt Gingrich have been hyping Hillary Clinton to win the Democratic nominee for the 2008 presidential election as well .

I would like to point out at this point that this is the most telling case to support my theory. Hillary Clinton, a supposed Democrat, is nothing more than a tool for the corporate elite and that is why so many Republicans are supporting her. The presidency is rigged for elite control, and the powers that be have designated Hillary Clinton to be their front man and our leader for at least the next four years.

Hillary Clinton, as you know is a
firm supporter of war in the middle east, both voting for the war in Iraq and supporting a military strike on Iran, even though Iran poses no immediate threat to the United States. Her voting record, aside from a few civil rights and health issues, largely echoes that of a hawkish Republican.

Indeed, when the evidence is presented, and believe me there is much more I intend to cover, there really is no difference between the two parties. And finally, as a nice little wrap up, here's a nice little
video for those that long for the golden days of our good friend President William Jefferson Blythe III.

















Censored on YouTube: Complete silence from the Anti-Defamation League on racist Obama hate video

Nazi Germany and Zionist Israel

Blog Archive

12.160 MHz Social Nework

Followers